The Right Evolutionary Doctrine: How Evolution Studies Should Have Come To Us

By Aan Gray, a voracious science reader.

I'm currently on a personal research project. I'm working on one thing: "The Right Evolutionary Doctrine". I'm not working against Charles Darwin's or Jean Lamarck's theories of evolution, but I'm working on a self-induced doctrine of how Evolution should be.

✓ Lemme share a short report:

Yes, we all know that...
× Archeologists have discovered and unearth many fossils from thousands of years ago. Animals that had lived on Earth and gone into eternal extinction. From scientific records, these fossils and have tested and their DNAs match that of the present animals we have in our midst today. In fact, fictional movies from visuospatial methods of reasoning have helped us to imagine how big and large those animals could have been. (Here: if only the supposedly pre-existed animals were larger than a common elephant).
× Evidence of Comparative Embryology have also contributed to the said-means of evolutionary studies. A situation where every organism share almost the same embryonic form. Taking a 3D imaginative view into the egg of a hen or any ave, you'd capture an exact image of an embryo with that of a developing fetus in a pregnant female human. Afterwards, the organism take up the characteristic features of their original parents. This is to say, evolutionary studies to this form wasn't faulty because the views were approximately correct.
But there's the problem:
Shall we say because monkeys, chimpanzees, baboons and the likes share almost the same body anatomies with human is/was the reason for evolution scientists to have brought up the scientific gibberish? Permit me, readers! I have a conclusive records against this belief. If you think or had thought that because of the reason of full-body hairs, humans evolved from monkeys, then it's nonsense! In this modern age, I have bumped into humans with half of their bodies covered with hairs.
The one very thing about this is that "our dis-adapting and re-adapting to things under the climatic severity over the years have brought the changes we've observed or seen in this population of humans. Evolution had only described this theory of life upside down. If we were actual monkeys, nothing would have transformed us into two-legged and cerebrally-complex organisms.
The genuineness of this is that every organism was made to maintain a fashion of life. This existentialism was the copious difference we have working on Earth.

Thank you for reading.
Tags: #ScienceWithGray #ScienceOnBuzz #Science